Most teams think they have a customer experience problem.
But what they’re actually dealing with is something harder to see—and harder to fix.
Because customer experience doesn’t usually break all at once. It breaks slowly, across systems, teams, and decisions that don’t quite line up. And when pressure hits, it doesn’t create the problem—it exposes what was already there.
That’s the pattern that showed up across every conversation in the CX Under Pressure series.
Not a lack of effort.
Not a lack of tools.
But a lack of alignment.
Prefer to listen to the conversation? Listen in here!
The Real Issue Isn’t the Moment—It’s the System
It’s easy to point to a specific interaction and call that the problem.
A missed reply.
A frustrated customer.
A public complaint that suddenly gains traction.
But those moments are rarely the starting point. They’re the visible result of something that’s been building behind the scenes.
In most organizations, teams are doing exactly what they’ve been asked to do. Marketing is focused on acquisition. Support is closing tickets. Social is managing engagement. Product is shipping features.
Individually, each function is working.
But collectively, the experience feels disconnected.
Because no one is truly responsible for how it all comes together from the customer’s point of view.
Fragmentation Is What Customers Actually Feel
From the inside, this often looks like a coordination issue.
From the outside, it feels like something much simpler: friction.
Customers don’t experience your teams separately. They experience the gaps between them.
They feel it when they have to repeat themselves across channels.
>They notice it when responses don’t quite match what happened before.
>They experience it when resolution takes longer than it should.
And importantly—they don’t care why it’s happening.
They just know it shouldn’t be this hard.
Why Customers Escalate (It’s Not What You Think)
There’s a common assumption that customers escalate because they’re angry.
Sometimes that’s true.
But more often, escalation is the result of something that didn’t happen earlier.
A response didn’t come.
A question went unanswered.
A signal was missed.
So customers try again—somewhere else.
They post publicly.
>They leave reviews.
>They move across platforms looking for someone who will respond.
By the time it becomes visible, it’s already been building for a while.
This is where many teams double down on speed. Faster replies. Shorter response times. More coverage.
But speed alone doesn’t fix the issue.
If the system isn’t designed to catch and act on signals early, escalation will keep happening.
Listening Isn’t the Problem—Acting Is
Most organizations are already listening to their customers.
They’re monitoring social channels.
>They’re collecting feedback.
>They’re running surveys and generating reports.
There’s no shortage of information.
The challenge is what happens after that.
Too often, customer feedback stays contained within a single team. It’s reviewed, summarized, and documented—but not consistently tied to decisions or operational changes.
And when that happens, listening becomes passive.
Customer experience only improves when feedback changes something:
How decisions are made.
>How teams operate.
>How systems are designed.
Without that connection, even the most advanced listening programs don’t move the needle.
Where AI Helps—and Where It Quietly Makes Things Worse
AI is becoming a bigger part of how teams manage customer experience.
And when it’s applied well, it can absolutely reduce friction.
But there’s a pattern emerging.
Teams are layering AI onto workflows that haven’t been clearly defined or aligned.
So instead of improving outcomes, they increase activity.
More responses.
>More automation.
>More output.
But the underlying issues are still there.
Customers still get stuck.
Signals still get missed.
Trust continues to erode.
AI doesn’t fix broken systems.
It makes them more visible.
The Shift From Reactive to Controlled Customer Experience
One of the clearest shifts happening right now is the move from reactive customer experience to something more intentional.
Reactive CX is focused on keeping up:
Managing incoming volume.
Reducing response times.
Handling issues as they appear.
And those things matter.
But they’re not enough.
Controlled CX looks at the system differently. It focuses on designing experiences that:
Catch issues earlier in the journey
Connect customer feedback to decisions
Track outcomes—not just activity
It’s a shift from reacting to problems…to reducing how often those problems happen in the first place.
The Metrics That Actually Tell the Truth
This shift also changes how success is measured.
Many teams still rely on activity-based metrics like engagement, volume, and response time.
Those metrics show what’s happening.
But they don’t show whether it’s working.
There’s a growing focus on outcome-based metrics instead:
Resolution — Are issues actually being solved?
Retention — Are customers staying?
Revenue impact — Is customer experience contributing to growth?
These are harder to track.
But they reflect what actually matters.
Customer Experience Is Not a Support Function
One of the biggest mindset shifts coming out of this series is this:
Customer experience isn’t just a support function.
It’s not just marketing either.
It’s a business function.
When it’s working, it protects trust, reduces churn, and supports growth.
When it’s not, the impact shows up just as clearly—in reputation, retention, and revenue.
Which means the real issue isn’t that customer experience is broken.
It’s that the systems behind it are incomplete.
Where the Real Work Is
Fixing customer experience isn’t about adding more tools or responding faster.
It’s about closing the gaps:
Between teams
Between signals and decisions
Between activity and outcomes
That’s the work.
And it’s also the opportunity.
Read the Transcript
[00:00:00] The problem with fragmented teams
Marketing owns acquisition support, owns the tickets, social owns the engagement, product owns the features. But what about the customers? When that’s fragmented, they’re the ones who are experiencing the gaps.
And trust me, they don’t give a flip about your org chart.
[00:00:24] Where CX starts to break
Hey, hey, party people and welcome back to the Social Media CX Podcast. Customer experience doesn’t break under pressure. It reveals what’s already broken. That’s what the entire CX under Pressure Series has been about. Over the last four episodes, we looked at customer experience from four very different angles.
We started with Tyler Stambaugh and we explored how brands are still over indexing on transactions instead of relationships. Then we talked to Katie Robert, where we saw how quickly reputation can unravel or be rebuilt right in public. We also chatted with Lisa Martin and unpacked how AI is fundamentally changing how trust works with our customers, and we ended with Scott Lee Holloway and looked at how the voice of customer and digital CX actually get operationalized at a large bank. Different conversations, but they all had the same conclusion. Most brands don’t have a customer experience problem. They have an operational discipline problem. Let’s get into the recap.
[00:01:49] Fragmentation across teams and systems
Let’s start where the series started, which is my conversation with Tyler, and he said something during the interview that really stuck with me, which was this: most organizations are still designing customer experience around transactions.
Sounds true because it’s they’re not looking at relationships. We see this everywhere. They respond just enough to get those tickets closed. They optimize just enough to get that conversion. They measure just enough to report on activity, but they don’t design what happens after.
As Tyler pointed out, that’s the gap. Because emotionally connected customers, we know this through research, they spend more, they stay longer, they advocate for your brand more. But most CX systems aren’t built to support that. If you haven’t listened to my episode with Tyler, go back to that one because it sets the foundation for everything else in this series. Another pattern that showed up across every conversation, and I do mean every conversation, is that everyone on your team touches the customer in one way or another.
However, it’s very rare that any one team or person owns the experience. Because marketing owns acquisition support, owns the tickets, social owns the engagement, product owns the features. But what about the customers? When that’s fragmented, they’re the ones who are experiencing the gaps.
And trust me, they don’t give a flip about your org chart. This is what Tyler was getting at when he talked about fragmented systems and patchwork tooling. And it’s also what Scott reinforced from a banking perspective.
[00:03:51] Why customers escalate (and how it actually starts)
He said, if voice of customer isn’t connected to decision-making, it just becomes noise. And that’s why and where CX starts to feel disconnected or delayed.
And definitely where it’s coming from a reactive place instead of a proactive place. And when that pressure hits, the fragmentation gets exposed quickly. This is where the conversation then with Katie hit really hard, because her story wasn’t about a massive crisis. It was just one customer who felt ignored and escalated things publicly on like several channels, but she was attacking the wrong company.
That’s the pattern, y’all. People don’t escalate because they’re angry. They do sometimes, but really they escalate and they go platform by platform and start leaving reviews in 17 different places because no one responded.
And Katie showed us that the fastest way to protect trust isn’t proving someone wrong.
“Hey, you’re talking to the wrong brand. This review isn’t for us.”
It’s just showing up and listening and seeing how they can help.
[00:05:09] How brand perception is formed
Inaction is no longer invisible. Thanks to social media, it’s public. And now it’s searchable. And increasingly it’s training the AI systems on how to describe your brand. So that when someone goes through and asks a question about an experience with your brand, if you’ve got all those negative social conversations, if you’ve got all those negative reviews, the AI is gonna pull from that and give that as this is what the brand experience is.
That’s not marketing. This is risk and risk, I don’t care how good your marketing is it’s going to hurt sales.
Then we brought in Lisa and she reframed the entire AI conversation in one sentence. Which was, if you apply AI to the wrong workflows, you get activity and not actual outcomes. That’s where most brands are right now.
They’ve deployed AI, but they haven’t defined where it should be used or what success looks like, or who even owns the outcome of that setup. So what happens? Your customers get stuck. This signals get missed, and trust continues to erode. And this isn’t because AI failed, we can’t blame it on the tool.
It’s because the system built around it wasn’t designed properly. When we just bolt AI on to a problem, that’s not a solve. And in public, these failures are highly visible.
[00:06:51] Listening vs. acting on customer signals
This is where Scott’s perspective becomes critical as well, because a lot of organizations are listening, but very few are acting on that information that they’re receiving.
Scott talked about how social listening feeds directly into decision making and operational improvements at APS bank. That’s the difference right there. It seems so simple. If you weren’t listening, you’d probably miss it. So that’s why I’m pointing it out here. That is the difference; not the act of listening itself, not the act of responding to these people on social and getting that voice of customer data from there too.
But taking action on what you find. Because voice of customer data without action is just another report for all of us to read, and we know that most of our reports don’t even get read in the first place. And by the way, reporting doesn’t improve your customer experience unless you’re doing something with that reporting.
The decisions that you make based on that reporting are what improves the customer experience.
[00:08:02] Reactive vs. controlled CX
When you connect all four of these conversations, the shift becomes pretty obvious. We are moving from reactive CX to controlled CX which is good.
We’re moving. It might be at a glacial pace, but we’re moving. Here’s what reactive looks like. Just in case you’re wondering, is this me? Wait times, long wait times, waiting for replies, internal customer support, long wait times, responding late, or not at all. Managing volume. “Oh, we have 10,000 conversations a month coming in.”
Great, but what are you doing with those conversations? That’s just a volume play. Controlled CX looks like designing systems, catching issues, early tracking outcomes from voice of customer data. So again, if you’re behind, that’s okay.
[00:08:56] The metrics that actually matter
But it’s likely because you’re still measuring things on social, specifically like impressions, engagement, volume instead of the three Rs: resolution, retention, and revenue impact.
So not only are we solving problems, we’re keeping those customers in our flock. We’re upping the lifetime value of that customer. But also, what kind of revenue impact are we having on the acquisition side? Are we able to help grab new customers too, and not just retain old ones?
So what does all this mean? It means that customer experience is no longer a support function. It’s not a marketing function. And it’s not a nice to have. It’s a risk and revenue function. If it’s done correctly with the right systems in place, it protects trust, it prevents churn, and it captures demand. And all of that for social care happens in public, which means it’s visible. Which means you’re accountable, which means word of mouth hopefully spreads in a good way, right? Positive sentiment versus negative sentiment.
If you wanna go deeper in everything we covered from the series, all the way from AI and automation to reputation, risk, response times, and what actually drives these outcomes, make sure you download our State of Social Care report for 2026.
It breaks down what’s actually happening across brands, where teams are falling short, and what the highest performing organizations are doing differently. It gives you a roadmap or a blueprint or a playbook to help set up or improve on your own social care program. You’ll find the link in the show notes, which is the transcript on whichever platform you are listening or watching on.
I wanna thank everybody, Katie, Tyler, Lisa, Scott, for all of the wisdom that they dropped and giving us a whole month of really top-notch content.
And on that note, if this series is helping you think different about customer experience and public channels, please rate and review us. It helps us bring on more thoughtful leaders like Tyler, Katie, Lisa, and Scott, and keeps our community growing with intention.
Until next time, think conversation, not campaign.
Brooke Sellas | @brookesellas: Thanks for tuning in to the Social Media CX podcast. If you loved today’s episode, don’t forget to subscribe, leave a review and share it with someone who needs to up their social care game.
Want to hear the full conversation? Listen to all of the CX Under Pressure episodes of the Social Media CX Podcast on YouTube. And if your team is thinking about what responsible social listening in banking or financial services actually looks like at scale, check out the State of Social Care Report 2026.
Finally, as always, Think conversation, not campaign.™
Latest posts by Brooke B. Sellas (See All)
- The Hidden Risk in Your Social Media Customer Experience - April 22, 2026
- Social Media Engagement: Real Questions Marketers Are Asking - April 15, 2026
- The Real Reason Customers Churn (It’s Not Your Product) - April 8, 2026
